California state attorneys will appear naked in the Supreme Court hoping to pass a law allowing the state to restrict access to video games to minors with its content. In response, the Entertainment Software Association (ESA) described how a decision in favor of the state can affect players in the United States .
The fear, according to ESA, is that computer game stores will stop selling certain titles at once, because “they don’t know which titles fall within the laws of a particular state and which are not.”If this example were needed on the spot, it is possible the developers would begin to Melt its content to please in Våge state regulations to shape it into shelves.
“Imagine that you go to your local game dealer and check if you are not selling the games you want because you are concerned about government intervention. this is not an exaggeration; This is a very real scenario that would happen if California succeeds, ” ESA’s Rich Taylor wrote in a post on the Official PlayStation blog.
To combat this potential scenario, ESA recommends gamers register on the computer games Voter Network, a site that defends the computer game industry during its endless legal struggles for legitimacy. Recently, magazine legend Stan Lee addressed his concerns for the computer game industry during a lengthy post on the vgvn website. In it, Lee discussed the mainstream reaction to his works created in the 1950s. The comics, Lee says, were in the midst of their own “national hysteria,” saying opponents of the sector claimed the medium had had a” dangerous effect “on young people and contributed to “juvenile delinquency.””
The magazine industry lost its initial fight for legitimacy when a Senate subcommittee posited that the country could not afford the calculated risk of feeding its children through comics, a concentrated regime of crime, horror and violence.Eventually, the state of Washington made it an offense to sell unlicensed comics, while the city of Los Angeles made the sale of all comics totally illegal.
ESA announced that more than 180 leading experts, non-profit organizations, associations, researchers, national organizations and scientific experts, had filed briefs in support of ESA’s position on Friday, citizenship day . The amicus briefs ask the U.S. Supreme Court to uphold the decision of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, which originally overturned the lawsuit filed by the state of California in 2005 and approved by Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger.
Depending on the policy of the game, the arguments in the amicus briefs approach things from very different angles. Some make the most common argument that restricting the computer game industry is equivalent to throwing First Amendment rights out the window, others argue that the proposal is an overreaction of the state of California, et al. say that the law will weigh on law enforcement, which should specialize in catching “real criminals”.”
Die ESA has published more than 20 amicus briefs in favor of its position and therefore the computer games industry itself. The list contains the arguments of developer Id Software [PDF-link], which focus in part on how the sports industry, which is influenced by the film industry in some aspects of design, and should therefore require equivalent consideration.
California isn’t the only state fighting the sports industry. Connecticut, Florida, Hawaii, Illinois, Louisiana, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Texas and Virginia all filed amicus briefs ” in favor of California’s proposed law.
Although the argument seems to specialize only in selling video games to a minor, its execution and definition can distort the freedom that developers have in creating titles. it’s not just about saying that kids shouldn’t play mature titles-the industry knows this and has a self-imposed points system on the field to avoid death-it’s about limiting the “questionable” content of all games to all or all players. Dying danger with this idea is that the simple question ” Who decides what is and is not debatable?”The indeterminacy of this potential response carries the risk of dying in the hands of companies that actually have their foot on the government’s neck when considering selling the software. to protect themselves, it is possible that retailers will refuse to sell titles containing content that they say attracts disapproving looks from the U.S. government können.so gives the government the power to design the content of Game Developers.
While this is often not the first time lawyers have argued on either side of the future of the industry, it is the first time such a high court has heard arguments.
Oral Arguments for Schwarzenegger v. Entertainment Merchants Association/ Entertainment Software Association, from the U.S. Supreme Court on All Souls ‘ Day .
[Update] the Academy of Interactive Arts and Sciences (AIAS) and the International Game Developers Association (IGDA) are among the organizations that have filed amicus briefs that support ESA’s position against the California bill. “Because of their iterations, video games deserve the equivalent protection that our” Constitution “has offered to film, television, music and literature,” Joseph Olin, president of the AIAS, said in a statement.
There is also an amicus letter in favor of ESA’s position of attorneys general [PDF link] from Rhode Island, Arkansas, Georgia, Nebraska , North Dakota, Oklahoma, Puerto Rico, South Carolina, Utah and Washington state.